Notre Dame
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
161 |
Michael Clevenger |
JR |
32:02 |
162 |
Tim Ball |
JR |
32:02 |
366 |
Jake Kildoo |
SR |
32:37 |
551 |
Jacob Dumford |
SO |
32:56 |
741 |
Scott Milling |
SO |
33:15 |
875 |
Kevin Durham |
JR |
33:28 |
913 |
Calvin Kraft |
FR |
33:31 |
1,037 |
Chris Marco |
SO |
33:42 |
1,142 |
Chris Quinn |
SR |
33:52 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
12.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
98.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Michael Clevenger |
Tim Ball |
Jake Kildoo |
Jacob Dumford |
Scott Milling |
Kevin Durham |
Calvin Kraft |
Chris Marco |
Chris Quinn |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
10/03 |
834 |
32:14 |
31:51 |
32:42 |
32:58 |
|
33:02 |
|
35:05 |
33:42 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/17 |
853 |
32:21 |
31:41 |
32:35 |
33:16 |
|
33:16 |
|
34:52 |
33:50 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B |
10/17 |
|
|
|
|
|
33:13 |
|
33:31 |
|
|
ACC Championships |
10/31 |
845 |
32:00 |
32:14 |
32:39 |
32:44 |
33:24 |
34:55 |
33:21 |
33:45 |
34:07 |
Great Lakes Region Championships |
11/14 |
818 |
31:45 |
32:32 |
32:28 |
32:48 |
33:10 |
|
33:39 |
33:01 |
|
NCAA Championship |
11/22 |
|
31:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.6% |
27.0 |
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Region Championship |
100% |
6.8 |
215 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.9 |
11.9 |
42.0 |
21.3 |
12.2 |
6.4 |
3.4 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Clevenger |
23.3% |
114.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
Tim Ball |
23.7% |
111.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jake Kildoo |
0.6% |
172.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob Dumford |
0.6% |
194.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Milling |
0.6% |
235.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Durham |
0.6% |
243.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calvin Kraft |
0.6% |
245.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Michael Clevenger |
19.2 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
5.2 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
Tim Ball |
18.8 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.8 |
4.5 |
3.9 |
4.9 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.3 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
Jake Kildoo |
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
Jacob Dumford |
55.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Scott Milling |
70.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Durham |
84.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calvin Kraft |
88.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.1% |
66.7% |
| |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
0.9% |
65.9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
4 |
5 |
11.9% |
0.2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
0.0 |
5 |
6 |
42.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
21.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
12.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
6.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
3.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.6% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
99.4 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Eastern Michigan |
1.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Iowa |
0.3% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Penn |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Texas A&M |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Georgia Tech |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |